The collection of proceedings of Institute of Practical Psychophysics (IPP), Moscow – 2014
Computer Non-Linear Diagnosis
V.I. Nesterov
The Non-linear Diagnosis Systems (NLS) have been extensively used lately and are gaining ever growing popularity. Even in the few cases, where the clinical symptoms look very typical, NLS diagnosis provides extra information about the extent of dysfunction and enables a better opportunity for a more comprehensive prognosis. In most cases it is of vital importance for diagnosis and consequently for the right choice of treatment.
In 2000 Theodore Van Hoven theory of quantum entropy logic (that underlies this method) had been in existence for 20 years. Non-linear diagnosis appears to be the most up-to-date of all methods of the hardware-based diagnosis. His discovery can be viewed as a significant landmark in diagnostic medicine.
Non-linear analysis was originally employed in organic chemistry to determine the composition of complex compounds.
Sviatoslav Pavlovich Nesterov, who introduced a trigger sensor in 1988 and thus framed the concept, is considered as the originator of the NLS-diagnosis device (metatron). Active work was immediately started to develop and improve the NLS-diagnostic systems. Clinical testing of the early equipment took the period from 1990 through 1995. The late 90s saw a fast growth of commercial production of the device and a sudden surge in the quality of the results produced.
The non-linear diagnosis method is still in its development stage. The diagnostic techniques are improving so fast that the system versions have to be updated every six months. Due to the introduction of some new devices, equipped with digital trigger sensors, the NLS-diagnosis has become not only far more time-efficient but also quite different in terms of quality. It is obvious that some routine techniques, for instance
three-dimensional visualization of investigation results will soon become a daily practice. The vegetative testing aspect (testing of specific item signatures against the client) is just one example of the developments. NLS analysis is now becoming so widely employed that we should rather speak about a definite range of indications for its use than just about its popularization.
Research centers continue their quest for some new investigation methods based on the non-linear analysis systems. So far the results appear to be quite promising. Unlike NMR and computer tomography, the NLS-analysis does not need strong fields. The method seems to have good prospects for metabolism studies, particular on a cellular level.
The NLS-method is advancing not only in technical innovation but also in new applications. Some minor surgical operations (e.g. biopsy) have long been monitored 4using ultrasound, fluoroscopy or computer tomography. Today we have an opportunity to have biopsy monitored by NLS. Many surgeons now focus on using this method to assist major surgeries.
The cost of equipment for NLS-diagnosis is still very low as compared to some other hardware-based methods. This should help promote more extensive use of the method in countries with low living standards. Of all methods of hardware-based diagnosis the NLS provides representations most proximate to the pathologic-anatomic picture. The feature of the method along with its harmlessness, promotes rapid development of the NLS-diagnosis.